SAP Overview
SAP
stands for Systems,
Applications
and Products
(Systeme, Anwendungen und Produkte in der Datenverarbeitung, in the
original German) in Data Processing. It uses the concept of modules
("individual programs that can be purchased, installed, and run
separately, but that all extract data from the common database").[1]
SAP AG, the company that provides the enterprise resource planning
solution has upgraded the package and launched it as SAP ECC 6.0 in
2005. ECC stands for ERP Central Component. The purpose of
positioning it as ECC is to enable SAP to build and develop an
environment of other products that can function upon the foundation
of the central component.
SAP's ERP solution includes several modules that support key
functional areas - some of them are -
SAP ERP Financials
SAP ERP Logistics
SAP ERP Human Resource Management
The evolution of mySAP ERP
SAP R/3 through version 4.6c consisted of various applications on
top of SAP Basis, SAP's set of middleware programs and tools.
When SAP R/3 Enterprise was launched in 2002, all applications were
built on top of the SAP Web Application Server. Extension sets were
used to deliver new features and kept the core as stable as
possible. The Web Application Server contained all the capabilities
of SAP Basis.
As a result of marketing changes and changes in the industry, other
versions of SAP have been released that address these changes. The
first edition of mySAP ERP was launched in 2003 and bundled
previously separate products, including SAP R/3 Enterprise, SAP
Strategic Enterprise Management (SEM) and extension sets. The SAP
Web Application Server was wrapped into NetWeaver, which was also
introduced in 2003.
A complete architecture change took place with the introduction of
mySAP ERP edition 2004. R/3 Enterprise was replaced with the
introduction of ERP Central Component (SAP ECC). The SAP Business
Warehouse, SAP Strategic Enterprise Management and Internet
Transaction Server were also merged into SAP ECC, allowing users to
run them under one instance. Architectural changes were also made to
support an enterprise services architecture to transition customers
to a services-oriented architecture.
Deployment and maintenance costs
SAP ERP systems effectively implemented can have cost benefits.
Integration is the key in this process. "Generally, a company's
level of data integration is highest when the company uses one
vendor to supply all of its modules." An out-of-box software package
has some level of integration but it depends on the expertise of the
company to install the system and how the package allows the users
to integrate the different modules.
It is estimated that "for a Fortune 500 company, software, hardware,
and consulting costs can easily exceed $100 million (around $50
million to $500 million). Large companies can also spend $50 million
to $100 million on upgrades. Full implementation of all modules can
take years," which also adds to the end price. Midsized companies
(fewer than 1,000 employees) are more likely to spend around $10
million to $20 million at most, and small companies are not likely
to have the need for a fully integrated SAP ERP system unless they
have the likelihood of becoming midsized and then the same data
applies as would a midsized company. Independent studies have
shown that deployment and maintenance costs of a SAP solution can
greatly vary depending on the organization. For example, some point
out that because of the rigid model proposed by the SAP tools, a lot
of customization code to adapt to the business process may have to
be developed and maintained. Some others pointed out that a
return on investment could only be obtained when there was both a
sufficient number of users and sufficient frequency of use.
Deploying SAP itself can also involve a lot of time and resources.
Advantages and disadvantages of SAP ERP
Advantages:
ERP allows easier global integration (Barriers of currency exchange
rates, language, and culture can be bridged automatically)
Updates only need to be done once to be implemented company wide
Provides real-time information, reducing the possibility of
redundancy errors
Creates a more
efficient work environment making it easier for employees to do
their job which leads to effectiveness.
Vendors have past knowledge and expertise on how to best build and
implement a system
No hardware purchase or maintenance costs
No developer training costs and the vendor will train the users
Disadvantages:
Locked into relationship by contract and manageability with vendor -
a contract can hold a company to the vendor until it expires and it
can be unprofitable to switch vendors if switching costs are too
high
Inflexibility- vendor packages may not fit a company's business
model exactly and customization can be very expensive
Return on Investment may take too long to be profitable
SAP ERP implementations have a risk of project failure.
|